I should have blogged yesterday, but I needed to check a formula which I wish to put here, which I will do in the next week (I hope). I will just talking here today about some random things.

First, today is the 37th anniversary of the first visit of men to another celestial body. Of course I'm talking about the moon, as we didn't manage to visit (at least personally) any other, which I hope to happen still in my lifespan. Indeed, i would like to do it one day (I know, I'm dreaming too much...). You can have more details in the Wikipedia article: Apollo 11.

Another thing is that I found an interesting paper in the arXiv yesterday:

Physical limits on information processing

Stephen D. H. Hsu

hep-th/0607082

It is about bounds on the velocity of information processes in nature. This article is one of many I've been following in the last years which shows a trend to study information as a physical quantity. I'd like to call it Information Physics, or maybe, to be a little more modern, iPhysics.

Anyway, I sent an email to Stephen asking about the definition of information process. He was kind enough to answer me very fast and I will reproduce it here as it may be interesting:

Stephen also pointed me to his blog "Information Processing", which is very interesting and I'm adding to my list in the lateral column.

First, today is the 37th anniversary of the first visit of men to another celestial body. Of course I'm talking about the moon, as we didn't manage to visit (at least personally) any other, which I hope to happen still in my lifespan. Indeed, i would like to do it one day (I know, I'm dreaming too much...). You can have more details in the Wikipedia article: Apollo 11.

Another thing is that I found an interesting paper in the arXiv yesterday:

Physical limits on information processing

Stephen D. H. Hsu

hep-th/0607082

It is about bounds on the velocity of information processes in nature. This article is one of many I've been following in the last years which shows a trend to study information as a physical quantity. I'd like to call it Information Physics, or maybe, to be a little more modern, iPhysics.

Anyway, I sent an email to Stephen asking about the definition of information process. He was kind enough to answer me very fast and I will reproduce it here as it may be interesting:

Hi Roberto,I'm using the Margolus-Levitin (ML) definition, which is evolutionfrom some initial state i to some orthogonal final state f (e.g.,| f > = 0 ).That is defined as a single operation.In classical computation this seems quite reasonable, as "flipping abit" presumably means moving some part of the system from, e.g., oneenergy eigenstate to another, which would mean a transition betweentwo orthogonal states.For quantum computation it is not so clear how to define a discreteunit of computation. However, I think what ML chose is veryreasonable. If you haven't evolved the system into a differentorthogonal state, it isn't really distinguishable from the initialstate as it still has some overlap with the initial state.Hope that makes sense.Cheers,Steve

Stephen also pointed me to his blog "Information Processing", which is very interesting and I'm adding to my list in the lateral column.

**Picture:**Astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the moon, from NASA.
## No comments:

Post a Comment